We Are Not Responsible!

The shooting on Saturday involving the Chief's Jovan Belcher is a terrible trajedy for all of those involved and I would be among many who are urging prayers for the deceased and their families. 

It is such a personal trajedy, that I have a difficult time with those who would turn this into an opportunity for political grandstanding.  Jim Geherty of the National Review has an important reminder about this for all of us.

On the telecast of Sunday night's Dallas Cowboys-Philadelphia Eagles game, NBC Sports anchor Bob Costas got up on his soapbox and quoted a column from Jason Whitlock, declaring, "Our current gun culture simply ensures that more and more domestic disputes will end in the ultimate tragedy, and that more convenience-store confrontations over loud music coming from a car will leave more teenage boys bloodied and dead. . . . Handguns do not enhance our safety. They exacerbate our flaws, tempt us to escalate arguments, and bait us into embracing confrontation rather than avoiding it."

Now that we know that Bob Costas and Jason Whitlock believe that guns emit some sort of magic mood-altering or mind-controlling wave that make people more confrontational and flawed, we can all hope that neither Costas or Whitlock get their hands on a gun. (One wonders if they're secretly Carl Rowan-style gun-control advocates.)

Stephen Kruiser: "Sanctimony has always been a Bob Costas hallmark, it's just creepier now that it's coming from his Madame Tussauds face."

There's a famous bumper sticker that says, quite correctly,  "Guns don't kill people, people kill people."  Each of us is created by God in His image, which means, He has endowed us will free will.  Each of us who has all of our normal faculties, is fully capable of making a free choice between good and evil, and we are free to act in accordance with those choices.  Blaming society is a denial of that gift of free will and a delusion. 

As for guns, G.K. Chesterton made the point about not giving toy guns to little boys, that St. Stephen could be killed by stones while St. Sebastian will never be killed by toy arrows.  A firearm is a tool, not an end. 

The Light of the World

“You are the light of the world. A city set on a hill cannot be hidden. ^{15 m}Nor do people light a lamp and put it under a basket, but on a stand, and it gives light to all in the house. ¹⁶ In the same way, let your light shine before others, so ⁿthat² they may see your good works and ^ogive glory to your Father who is in heaven. (Mt 5:14-16, ESV)

A couple of days ago I read an interesting post by Bruce Charlton, a British professor and prolific writer and blogger.  He always has some interesting point to make on his blog. The post I refer to was titled, Should Christians Self-Identify in the West?  His conclusion was in the affirmative, and he gave two or three or more reasons for saying so. There was one I thought was one easily over looked by most people today.

And partly because most non-Christians self-identify...

...so that devout adherents of most other religions are usually immediately identifiable - and so are anti-Christians by their style of dress (youth cult allegiance, immodesty), bodily self-mutilations, badges, consumption and conspicuous life styles.

It isn't fashionable, or politically correct, to be Christian these days. It's actually positively frowned upon. We are to keep our religion to ourselves if we are Christian, especially if we are Catholic Christians. Yet, as Mr. Charleton pointed out, for members of other religious groups, for instance, Muslims, these rules don't apply.  Why shouldn’t Christians be more visible in the world?

The question is, how do we do this?  Professor Charlton doesn't tell us, but one way could be to make ourselves more conspicuous by wearing a crucifix around our neck or as a lapel pin.  We could wear gaudy t-shirts that proclaim some Christian message.  I guess we could even wear sackcloth and ashes on occasion.  After all, Jesus did say, “A city set on a hill cannot be hidden,” we shouldn’t just be invisible. 

Yet this isn’t the way Christians have “self-identified” in the past.  For instance, since the days of the early Church, Christians have self-identified by the way they live their lives.  The Letter to Diognetus tells us:

Christians are indistinguishable from other men either by nationality, language or customs. They do not inhabit separate cities of their own, or speak a strange dialect, or follow some outlandish way of life. Their teaching is not based upon reveries inspired by the curiosity of men. Unlike some other people, they champion no purely human doctrine. With regard to dress, food and manner of life in general, they follow the customs of whatever city they happen to be living in, whether it is Greek or foreign.

And yet there is something extraordinary about their lives. They live in their own countries as though they were only passing through. They play their full role as citizens, but labor under all the disabilities of aliens. Any country can be their homeland, but for them their homeland, wherever it may be, is a foreign country. Like others, they marry and have children, but they do not expose them. They share their meals, but not their wives.

It seems it was the distinguishing marks of the early Christians not to be distinguished; they blended in, as far as the casual observer was concerned.  Yet, there was “something extraordinary” about them – they lived their lives in a different way, with different goals, than their non-Christian neighbors.  They self-identified by living truly Christian lives.

I agree with Professor Charlton that Christians should self-identify, but that doesn't mean we have to wear different clothes, or Christian symbols around our necks.  We should self-identify by living Christian lives.  Christians today are indistinguishable from those around them, but sadly, for the most part, neither is there much extraordinary about them.  Too often, they’re willing to share both their meals and their wives; they’ve surrendered to the culture.  We should be noticed as Christians, not because we don't dress like those we live and work with, but because we don't act like those around us; we act like someone seeking to be holy.

How do we do that?  St Josemaria Escriva had a specific, and simple, method for Christians to follow, described by Scott Hahn in his book Ordinary Work, Extraordinary Grace:

“St Josemaria Escrva sketched out a simple apostolic program: ‘First, prayer; then, atonement; in the third place, very much “in the third place,” action.”  Most of our apostolate, then, will be invisible.  Our friends might someday glimpse the tip of the iceberg – maybe.  In heaven, however, they’ll know our love in its very depths.”

Prayer, atonement, action – these are the steps necessary if Christians are to have any hope of self-identifying, maybe also the only hope of the West itself.  It's a call to Christians, and our neighbors, to true conversion.  Little else has worked to change our steadily declining culture; this surely can.

Obama's Anti-Catholic Moves

The bishops have a link on their web site objecting strenously to the Obama administrations decision on Friday, January 20th which ". . .ordered almost every employer and insurer in the country to provide sterilization and contraceptives, including some abortion-inducing drugs, in their health plans....Never before has the federal government forced individuals and organizations to go out into the marketplace and buy a product that violates their conscience. This shouldn't happen in a land where free exercise of religion ranks first in the Bill of Rights."

To sign a petition protesting this decision, follow the link on the Bishop's site.